Blog
Compliance isn't
a constraint.
It's a competitive advantage.
44
articles
73
categories
FR/EN
languages
It's a competitive advantage.
Article 13 of the EU AI Act requires providers of high-risk AI systems to supply deployers with precise, structured instructions for use. Discover the eight mandatory content elements, the most common drafting mistakes, and a section-by-section template you can adapt today.
Public contracting authorities that deploy high-risk AI systems are now deployers under Article 26 of the EU AI Act, with legal obligations that must flow through procurement contracts. This guide explains the mandatory clauses, CE marking verification steps, and the five-step process every public buyer needs before awarding an AI contract.
ISO 42001 certification and EU AI Act compliance are not the same thing- but they are not unrelated either. This practical guide maps the requirements of the AI Management System standard against the obligations of Regulation (EU) 2024/1689, identifies the critical gaps, and explains what ISO 42001 actually buys you in a regulatory audit context.
Post-Brexit, the EU and UK have taken fundamentally different paths to regulating artificial intelligence. This article compares the two frameworks across scope, risk classification, enforcement, and documentation requirements- and explains what dual-market compliance actually looks like in practice.
A structured four-week preparation plan for your EU AI Act internal audit: from building your AI system inventory in week one to producing a prioritised action report in week four. Includes deliverables, responsible parties, and tools for each phase.
Article 72 of the EU AI Act requires high-risk AI providers to maintain an active post-market monitoring system throughout the system's lifetime. This guide explains what the plan must contain, how it connects to incident reporting under Article 73, and the key deadlines.
6 of 11